Countries with declining populations often strategize to promote births. Unfortunately, they rarely try loosening the grip of state economic control.
โข
The new book ‘Welfare for Markets’ contextualizes the centuries-long effort to disentangle social welfare investments from broken bureaucratic programs.
โข
Argentina’s economist-turned-president has defied the odds (and the experts’ opinions) to set a “society sick with socialism” back on a path to fiscal health.
โข
Do lower interest rates in other countries really mean the Fed is too tight?
โข
A shift of foreign investments from dollars to euros would only make inflation and confiscation risks worse.
As long as benefit cliffs are treated primarily as a math problem, we will continue to miss the mark. Benefit cliffs are not just technical design flaws โ they are psychological traps.
โข
Michelle Bowmanโs remarks offer a clear vision for a more focused, flexible, and transparent regulatory regime. It’s a welcome recalibration.
Bastiat’s writing combines campy, folksy stories with blinding economic logic. Even 200 years later, he has much to teach us.
The best the Fed can do (whether or not tariff shocks appear) is keep nominal spending on a stable trajectory.ย
Politicians might prefer lower interest rates, but the Fed must protect its fragile post-pandemic progress on prices. Credibility is hard earned and easily lost.
Countries with declining populations often strategize to promote births. Unfortunately, they rarely try loosening the grip of state economic control.
โข
The new book ‘Welfare for Markets’ contextualizes the centuries-long effort to disentangle social welfare investments from broken bureaucratic programs.
โข
Argentina’s economist-turned-president has defied the odds (and the experts’ opinions) to set a “society sick with socialism” back on a path to fiscal health.
โข
Do lower interest rates in other countries really mean the Fed is too tight?
โข
A shift of foreign investments from dollars to euros would only make inflation and confiscation risks worse.
As long as benefit cliffs are treated primarily as a math problem, we will continue to miss the mark. Benefit cliffs are not just technical design flaws โ they are psychological traps.
โข
Michelle Bowmanโs remarks offer a clear vision for a more focused, flexible, and transparent regulatory regime. It’s a welcome recalibration.
Bastiat’s writing combines campy, folksy stories with blinding economic logic. Even 200 years later, he has much to teach us.
The best the Fed can do (whether or not tariff shocks appear) is keep nominal spending on a stable trajectory.ย
Politicians might prefer lower interest rates, but the Fed must protect its fragile post-pandemic progress on prices. Credibility is hard earned and easily lost.
By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: . You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact