Associate Research Fellow
Nikolai G. Wenzel is Professor of Economics at Universidad de las Hespรฉrides, where he is the founding director of the MA and PhD in Economics. He is a Research Fellow of the American Institute for Economic Research and the Independent Institute.ย Dr. Wenzel is a member of the Mont Pelerin Society and the Philadelphia Society.
Left and right increasingly compete over how to wield government power rather than whether to limit it. Stephanie Sladeโs ‘Fusionism’ asks whether liberty and restraint still have a constituency.
Even among โsincere friends of freedom,โ disagreement over governmentโs role runs deep. Can a state be big enough to defend liberty without also violating it?
From technocrats to central planners, the temptation to engineer society persists. Adam Smith saw the dangers clearly.
Capital loaned out can’t be invested or consumed. Interest compensating the lender is merely “the price of time.”
The American Founding launched a revolutionary idea: rights exist first, and government exists to secure them. It’s beautiful, transformative… and perpetually unfinished.
The pledge demands patriotic devotion. The skeptical Constitution builds limits on power. Only one protects liberty.
History โ and a gritty 1970s vigilante flick โ offers sobering lessons about what happens when public institutions fail at their most basic task: keeping citizens safe.
Protecting kids is a weak pretext for total digital surveillance. What’s worse, the EU’s monitoring exempted its own politicians from scrutiny. Their privacy matters, but not yours.
Javier Mileiโs aggressive reforms have slashed spending, curbed inflation, and reignited growth. Argentinaโs midterms will decide whether reform endures.
A combination of constitutional and commercial fixtures set Japan up for stability and growth, even as its Southeast Asian neighbors struggled.
Left and right increasingly compete over how to wield government power rather than whether to limit it. Stephanie Sladeโs ‘Fusionism’ asks whether liberty and restraint still have a constituency.
Even among โsincere friends of freedom,โ disagreement over governmentโs role runs deep. Can a state be big enough to defend liberty without also violating it?
From technocrats to central planners, the temptation to engineer society persists. Adam Smith saw the dangers clearly.
Capital loaned out can’t be invested or consumed. Interest compensating the lender is merely “the price of time.”
The American Founding launched a revolutionary idea: rights exist first, and government exists to secure them. It’s beautiful, transformative… and perpetually unfinished.
The pledge demands patriotic devotion. The skeptical Constitution builds limits on power. Only one protects liberty.
History โ and a gritty 1970s vigilante flick โ offers sobering lessons about what happens when public institutions fail at their most basic task: keeping citizens safe.
Protecting kids is a weak pretext for total digital surveillance. What’s worse, the EU’s monitoring exempted its own politicians from scrutiny. Their privacy matters, but not yours.
Javier Mileiโs aggressive reforms have slashed spending, curbed inflation, and reignited growth. Argentinaโs midterms will decide whether reform endures.
A combination of constitutional and commercial fixtures set Japan up for stability and growth, even as its Southeast Asian neighbors struggled.
By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: . You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact